top of page

6 Executive Team Offsite Facilitators for Independent Schools in Adelaide.

  • Writer: Jonno White
    Jonno White
  • Jul 29
  • 7 min read

These six executive team offsite facilitators serve Adelaide and can help independent-school leaders with strategy, governance, team alignment or harder conversations. Four have clear Adelaide presence, while four show direct school-sector work. The right shortlist depends on whether your offsite centres on the board, the principal, the executive team or the whole-school plan.

 

 

I compiled this directory of executive team offsite facilitators serving Adelaide independent schools to make it easier to find someone who fits the situation. In full transparency, I also provide this work, so I have kept my own work outside the verified provider list. You can read more about my background.

 

How to use this directory.

 

Start with the decision your school needs to make, not the personality of the facilitator. A board strategy reset is a different job from rebuilding trust inside an executive team. A whole-school planning day also needs different preparation from a principal and board-chair alignment session.

 

This distinction matters in South Australia. The Association of Independent Schools of South Australia says its members educate nearly 20 per cent of the state’s children. Its governance guidance also points to role clarity and relationships between the board and principal as recurring governance concerns.

 

For a strategy offsite, ask whether the facilitator has worked with the people who will be in the room and the governance boundary around them. For a team offsite, ask how they diagnose the real tension before the day and how they turn the conversation into decisions, owners and follow-through.

 

If the offsite is still taking shape, this guide to planning a leadership retreat can help you write a tighter brief before you approach anyone.

 

Quick comparison.

 

Here is a quick reference for the six facilitators verified for this directory. School evidence and Adelaide evidence are shown separately because a national education specialist and a local generalist can both be useful, but for different reasons.

 

Provider

Publicly evidenced school fit

Adelaide evidence

Suitable for

Delivery evidence

Whole-school strategy and school leadership

Based in Adelaide

Whole-school plans and leadership-team development

Workshops, planning, coaching

Independent-school heads and senior teams

Serves Australia, no local base claimed

Leadership retreats with a wellbeing lens

One to three days

Independent, government and faith-based education

Hutton Education lists an Adelaide office

Strategy, board and executive alignment

Facilitation and implementation planning

Independent-school governance and strategy

National delivery, no local base claimed

Board, principal and governance alignment

Full-day and multi-day workshops

Education and research institutions

Established in Adelaide

Strategy, values and leadership alignment

Two hours to a full week

No school claim found on the fetched page

Brighton, South Australia

Trust, clarity and difficult executive conversations

One-to-two-day offsites

 

Six facilitators serving Adelaide independent schools.

 

1. Kaye Mathwin-Cox, Adelaide.

 

Kaye Mathwin-Cox is the founder of KMC Consulting and works from Adelaide. Her public services include whole-school strategic planning, stakeholder workshops, leadership development and coaching for executives and teams.

 

That combination makes her a credible person to consider when an independent school wants the offsite connected to a wider planning process rather than treated as a single event. Her school-specific evidence is also direct, not inferred from generic executive work.

 

 

2. Aimee Presnall, national delivery.

 

Aimee Presnall founded Well-Nest and works with heads and senior teams in independent schools across Australia. Well-Nest describes one-to-three-day executive leadership retreats as well as leadership workshops.

 

She is a relevant person to consider when wellbeing, sustainable leadership practice and team connection are part of the desired result. The fetched site supports independent-school experience, but this directory does not claim that she is based in Adelaide.

 

 

3. Fiona Hutton, national with an Adelaide office.

 

Fiona Hutton founded Hutton Education. Her public profile describes facilitated strategic-planning work with educational systems, boards, principals and executive teams, including independent and faith-based organisations.

 

Hutton Education says it works nationally and lists Adelaide among its offices. Fiona’s fit is strongest where the offsite needs to connect vision, governance, strategy and practical implementation across more than one leadership group.

 

 

4. Dr Paul Teys, national delivery.

 

Dr Paul Teys offers governance training and tailored strategic-planning workshops for independent schools. His public page describes four decades of independent-school work across Australia, with attention to executive relationships, strategic direction and board practice.

 

He is a relevant option when the board-principal relationship or governance system is central to the offsite. The service can run as a full day or across multiple days, in person or online. This directory does not claim an Adelaide base.

 

 

5. Troy Forrest, Adelaide.

 

Troy Forrest is the founder of Strategy Road, an Adelaide facilitation practice that works with boards and leadership teams. The organisation names education and research institutions among its sectors and describes engagements from two hours to a full week.

 

He is a relevant option for strategy, values, alignment and decision-focused facilitation. The public evidence supports education-sector work, but it does not state independent-school experience as clearly as the first four entries.

 

 

6. Tim Gill, Brighton, South Australia.

 

Tim Gill leads Qurios from Brighton, South Australia. Qurios describes one-to-two-day offsites for executive teams, with a focus on trust, clarity and conversations that teams may otherwise avoid.

 

He is a relevant local option when the need is primarily executive-team effectiveness rather than school governance or education strategy. The fetched page does not claim school-sector work, so a school should test that context directly in its written brief.

 

 

What the verified set shows.

 

Four of the six people have explicit Adelaide presence through a personal base or an organisational office. Four have explicit school or independent-school evidence. All six have direct evidence of facilitation, retreats, offsites or strategic workshops.

 

Those numbers were calculated only from the six profiles above. They are not a league table. They show why it is useful to test location, sector experience and facilitation skill as three separate questions.

 

One additional organisation is worth browsing. Conscious Education describes Adelaide school-strategy work, but the accessible pages did not give me enough evidence to name one individual as the verified facilitator. I have therefore left it outside the numbered list.

 

A worked shortlist using public information.

 

Imagine an Adelaide independent school whose board has approved a new direction, but the principal and executive team need to turn it into three shared priorities for the next school year. The offsite needs one day of facilitated work, clear decision rights and a short written record of the outcomes.

 

On public evidence alone, Kaye Mathwin-Cox is worth testing because her services connect whole-school planning with leadership development. Fiona Hutton is worth testing because her work joins boards, principals, executives and implementation. Dr Paul Teys is worth testing if board-principal governance is the harder part of the problem.

 

If the deeper need is executive wellbeing and sustainable leadership, Aimee Presnall may move onto the shortlist. If it is a local strategy process without a firm school-specialist requirement, Troy Forrest may be relevant. If the problem is trust and candour inside the executive team, Tim Gill’s public focus may fit.

 

This example is a decision walkthrough, not a recommendation or a claim that any person is available. It shows how the same six names produce a different shortlist when the real need changes.

 

What to ask for in a written proposal.

 

Send every shortlisted facilitator the same one-page brief. State the decision that must be made, who will attend, what has already been decided, what is still open, the tensions that cannot be ignored and the useful output you expect after the day.

 

Ask each person to reply in writing with their proposed process, pre-work, role on the day, output, follow-through, travel assumptions and total inclusions. Comparing like with like is more useful than comparing a day rate with a broader project fee.

 

Ask for one relevant example of similar work, while respecting client confidentiality. The evidence should match your situation. A generic corporate leadership day is not automatically proof of school-governance experience, and a strong education strategy record is not automatically proof of executive-team repair.

 

This guide on how to choose an executive offsite facilitator offers more questions. If team contribution and working relationships are central, Working Genius in schools may also give you a useful shared language.

 

Limitations and the strongest counterargument.

 

This directory uses public evidence available on 28 July 2026. Websites can lag behind current work, and they do not prove availability, chemistry, safeguarding readiness, travel terms or the quality of a specific engagement.

 

The strongest counterargument is that sector experience can be over-weighted. A highly skilled facilitator from another regulated or mission-led sector may ask sharper questions than a school specialist who relies on familiar patterns. That is fair.

 

The practical answer is not to insist on a school-only provider. It is to decide whether school governance, board-principal boundaries, community expectations or education strategy are material to this offsite. When they are, ask for direct evidence. When they are not, prioritise the facilitation method and the problem in the room.

 

For a wider local search without the school-sector filter, use the broader Adelaide facilitator directory.

 

A 20-minute next action.

 

Set a visible 20-minute timer. Write one sentence each for the decision, the people in the room, the hardest unresolved tension and the output you need.

 

Then choose three names whose public evidence matches those four sentences. Send all three the same written brief. This keeps the comparison fair and stops a polished introductory conversation from becoming the selection method.

 

How this directory was compiled.

 

I searched Adelaide, nearby South Australian locations and national providers serving the city for people who genuinely offer executive offsite, leadership-retreat, governance-workshop or strategic-planning facilitation. I included only named people whose current service could be checked on their own website.

 

School evidence and Adelaide evidence were recorded separately. Where an organisation appeared relevant but the accessible page did not identify one person strongly enough, I listed the organisation to browse rather than presenting an individual as verified. This directory was last checked in July 2026.

 

The local sector context came from the Association of Independent Schools of South Australia and its Leadership Institute. Provider descriptions link directly to the relevant provider-owned pages.

 

If you would rather have an independent-school leadership offsite designed and facilitated without the guesswork, that is the work I do. I help leaders build organisations people would move cities to work at, with sessions that are practical enough to use on Monday morning. You can reach me at jonno@consultclarity.org.

 
 
bottom of page